Guatemala vs Nicaragua: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Guatemala
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 0.1177 against 0.1102 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0075.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Guatemala ranks 117th and Nicaragua ranks 119th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 4 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0691 | 0.0434 | 0.0256 | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 0.0677 | 0.0455 | 0.0222 | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 0.0845 | 0.0831 | 0.0013 | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0.0995 | 0.1102 | 0.0107 | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 0.1177 | 0.1102 | 0.0075 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Guatemala or Nicaragua?
- Guatemala, at 0.1177 against 0.1102 in Nicaragua as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Guatemala and Nicaragua?
- 0.0075, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Nicaragua?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Guatemala and Nicaragua rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Guatemala ranks 117th and Nicaragua ranks 119th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.