Guinea-Bissau vs Sudan: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0.0352 against 0.0297 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0055.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Guinea-Bissau's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Sudan ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 171st and Sudan ranks 169th of 183 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0278 | 0.0278 | Sudan |
| 1990s | 0.0031 | 0.011 | 0.0079 | Sudan |
| 2000s | 0.0045 | 0.019 | 0.0145 | Sudan |
| 2010s | 0.02 | 0.0347 | 0.0147 | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0297 | 0.0352 | 0.0055 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Guinea-Bissau or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0.0352 against 0.0297 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Guinea-Bissau and Sudan?
- 0.0055, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Sudan?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Sudan rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 171st and Sudan ranks 169th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.