Guinea vs South Sudan: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Guinea
- South Sudan
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 0.0173 against 0.0039 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0134.
That makes Guinea's figure about 4.4 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was South Sudan ahead.
Guinea ranks 178th and South Sudan ranks 179th of 183 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0007 | 0 | 0.0007 | Guinea |
| 1990s | 0.0082 | 0 | 0.0082 | Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.007 | 0.0001 | 0.007 | Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.0168 | 0.0023 | 0.0145 | Guinea |
| 2020s | 0.0173 | 0.0039 | 0.0134 | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Guinea or South Sudan?
- Guinea, at 0.0173 against 0.0039 in South Sudan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Guinea and South Sudan?
- 0.0134, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and South Sudan?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Guinea and South Sudan rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Guinea ranks 178th and South Sudan ranks 179th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.