Indonesia vs Paraguay: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Indonesia
- Paraguay
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 0.1571 against 0.1394 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.0177.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Paraguay ahead.
Indonesia ranks 105th and Paraguay ranks 107th of 183 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0504 | 0.0489 | 0.0015 | Indonesia |
| 1990s | 0.1353 | 0.0781 | 0.0572 | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 0.1053 | 0.0585 | 0.0468 | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 0.1411 | 0.1072 | 0.0339 | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 0.1571 | 0.1394 | 0.0177 | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Indonesia or Paraguay?
- Indonesia, at 0.1571 against 0.1394 in Paraguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Indonesia and Paraguay?
- 0.0177, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Paraguay?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Indonesia and Paraguay rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Indonesia ranks 105th and Paraguay ranks 107th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.