Iran vs Philippines: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Iran
- Philippines
How they compare
Iran currently reports 0.2061 against 0.1952 in Philippines, a difference of 0.0109.
That makes Iran's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Philippines ahead.
Iran ranks 87th and Philippines ranks 90th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Iran averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0537 | 0.0904 | 0.0367 | Philippines |
| 1990s | 0.0507 | 0.1193 | 0.0686 | Philippines |
| 2000s | 0.1045 | 0.1269 | 0.0224 | Philippines |
| 2010s | 0.1746 | 0.1574 | 0.0172 | Iran |
| 2020s | 0.2061 | 0.1952 | 0.0109 | Iran |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Iran or Philippines?
- Iran, at 0.2061 against 0.1952 in Philippines as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Iran and Philippines?
- 0.0109, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Philippines?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Iran and Philippines rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Iran ranks 87th and Philippines ranks 90th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.