Jamaica vs Luxembourg: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Jamaica
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.7481 against 0.7113 in Jamaica, a difference of 0.0368.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Jamaica ranks 23rd and Luxembourg ranks 21st of 183 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.3096 | 0.527 | 0.2174 | Luxembourg |
| 1990s | 0.319 | 0.5693 | 0.2503 | Luxembourg |
| 2000s | 0.2771 | 0.5866 | 0.3095 | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0.5012 | 0.626 | 0.1248 | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0.7113 | 0.7481 | 0.0368 | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Jamaica or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 0.7481 against 0.7113 in Jamaica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Jamaica and Luxembourg?
- 0.0368, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Luxembourg?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Jamaica and Luxembourg rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Jamaica ranks 23rd and Luxembourg ranks 21st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.