Jordan vs Mauritius: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Jordan
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0.3893 against 0.3619 in Jordan, a difference of 0.0274.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 48th and Mauritius ranks 45th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 3 and Mauritius in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.243 | 0.1586 | 0.0844 | Jordan |
| 1990s | 0.2733 | 0.2457 | 0.0276 | Jordan |
| 2000s | 0.3478 | 0.3184 | 0.0294 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0.3424 | 0.3943 | 0.0519 | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0.3619 | 0.3893 | 0.0275 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Jordan or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 0.3893 against 0.3619 in Jordan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Jordan and Mauritius?
- 0.0274, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Mauritius?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Jordan and Mauritius rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Jordan ranks 48th and Mauritius ranks 45th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.