Kazakhstan vs Sri Lanka: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Kazakhstan
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.1599 against 0.1506 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0093.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 104th and Sri Lanka ranks 106th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0636 | 0.0636 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 0.0315 | 0.071 | 0.0396 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0.1191 | 0.0985 | 0.0206 | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0.1619 | 0.1229 | 0.039 | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0.1599 | 0.1506 | 0.0093 | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Kazakhstan or Sri Lanka?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.1599 against 0.1506 in Sri Lanka as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Kazakhstan and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0093, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sri Lanka?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Sri Lanka rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Kazakhstan ranks 104th and Sri Lanka ranks 106th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.