Latvia vs North Macedonia: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Latvia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 0.2196 against 0.2126 in Latvia, a difference of 0.007.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Latvia ranks 83rd and North Macedonia ranks 81st of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 1990s | 0.0449 | 0.1382 | 0.0933 | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 0.1457 | 0.1172 | 0.0285 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.2085 | 0.1761 | 0.0324 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.2126 | 0.2196 | 0.0071 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Latvia or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 0.2196 against 0.2126 in Latvia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Latvia and North Macedonia?
- 0.007, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and North Macedonia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Latvia and North Macedonia rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Latvia ranks 83rd and North Macedonia ranks 81st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.