Libya vs Senegal: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Libya
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 0.0972 against 0.0901 in Libya, a difference of 0.0071.
That makes Senegal's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Senegal ahead.
Libya ranks 129th and Senegal ranks 128th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Senegal in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0638 | 0.0817 | 0.0179 | Senegal |
| 1990s | 0.0739 | 0.0577 | 0.0162 | Libya |
| 2000s | 0.0386 | 0.0618 | 0.0232 | Senegal |
| 2010s | 0.0646 | 0.0872 | 0.0226 | Senegal |
| 2020s | 0.0901 | 0.0972 | 0.0072 | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Libya or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 0.0972 against 0.0901 in Libya as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Libya and Senegal?
- 0.0071, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Senegal?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Libya and Senegal rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Libya ranks 129th and Senegal ranks 128th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.