Malaysia vs United States: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Malaysia
- United States
How they compare
United States currently reports 0.8272 against 0.8259 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0013.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was United States ahead.
Malaysia ranks 14th and United States ranks 13th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and United States in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.44 | 0.39 | 0.0501 | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 0.5724 | 0.7319 | 0.1595 | United States |
| 2000s | 0.679 | 0.858 | 0.1789 | United States |
| 2010s | 0.7864 | 0.8194 | 0.033 | United States |
| 2020s | 0.8259 | 0.8272 | 0.0013 | United States |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Malaysia or United States?
- United States, at 0.8272 against 0.8259 in Malaysia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Malaysia and United States?
- 0.0013, with United States ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and United States?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Malaysia and United States rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Malaysia ranks 14th and United States ranks 13th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.