Mozambique vs Samoa: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Mozambique
- Samoa
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 0.1038 against 0.1014 in Samoa, a difference of 0.0024.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Samoa ahead.
Mozambique ranks 124th and Samoa ranks 126th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 3 and Samoa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0208 | 0.0208 | Samoa |
| 1990s | 0.039 | 0.0345 | 0.0045 | Mozambique |
| 2000s | 0.0466 | 0.0626 | 0.016 | Samoa |
| 2010s | 0.0959 | 0.0846 | 0.0113 | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 0.1038 | 0.1014 | 0.0024 | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Mozambique or Samoa?
- Mozambique, at 0.1038 against 0.1014 in Samoa as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Mozambique and Samoa?
- 0.0024, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Samoa?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Mozambique and Samoa rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Mozambique ranks 124th and Samoa ranks 126th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.