Oman vs Saudi Arabia: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Oman
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Oman currently reports 0.1858 against 0.1763 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.0095.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Oman ahead.
Oman ranks 95th and Saudi Arabia ranks 98th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0648 | 0.0657 | 0.0009 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1990s | 0.0934 | 0.089 | 0.0044 | Oman |
| 2000s | 0.1145 | 0.117 | 0.0025 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 0.1569 | 0.1346 | 0.0223 | Oman |
| 2020s | 0.1858 | 0.1763 | 0.0096 | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Oman or Saudi Arabia?
- Oman, at 0.1858 against 0.1763 in Saudi Arabia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Oman and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.0095, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Saudi Arabia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Oman and Saudi Arabia rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Oman ranks 95th and Saudi Arabia ranks 98th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.