Pakistan vs Ukraine: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Pakistan
- Ukraine
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0.0772 against 0.0741 in Ukraine, a difference of 0.0031.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 139th and Ukraine ranks 141st of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 3 and Ukraine in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0656 | 0 | 0.0656 | Pakistan |
| 1990s | 0.0622 | 0.0266 | 0.0356 | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 0.0787 | 0.1666 | 0.0879 | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 0.0699 | 0.1435 | 0.0736 | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 0.0772 | 0.0741 | 0.0031 | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Pakistan or Ukraine?
- Pakistan, at 0.0772 against 0.0741 in Ukraine as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Pakistan and Ukraine?
- 0.0031, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Ukraine?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Pakistan and Ukraine rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Pakistan ranks 139th and Ukraine ranks 141st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.