Paraguay vs Romania: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Paraguay
- Romania
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 0.1394 against 0.1345 in Romania, a difference of 0.0049.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Romania ahead.
Paraguay ranks 107th and Romania ranks 109th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0489 | 0.1057 | 0.0568 | Romania |
| 1990s | 0.0781 | 0.1133 | 0.0352 | Romania |
| 2000s | 0.0585 | 0.0918 | 0.0333 | Romania |
| 2010s | 0.1072 | 0.1339 | 0.0267 | Romania |
| 2020s | 0.1394 | 0.1345 | 0.005 | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Paraguay or Romania?
- Paraguay, at 0.1394 against 0.1345 in Romania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Paraguay and Romania?
- 0.0049, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Romania?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Paraguay and Romania rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Paraguay ranks 107th and Romania ranks 109th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.