Solomon Islands vs Timor-Leste: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Solomon Islands
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 0.0384 against 0.0373 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.0011.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Solomon Islands ranks 164th and Timor-Leste ranks 166th of 183 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0311 | 0 | 0.0311 | Solomon Islands |
| 1990s | 0.019 | 0 | 0.019 | Solomon Islands |
| 2000s | 0.0257 | 0.0233 | 0.0025 | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 0.0338 | 0.026 | 0.0079 | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 0.0384 | 0.0373 | 0.0011 | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Solomon Islands or Timor-Leste?
- Solomon Islands, at 0.0384 against 0.0373 in Timor-Leste as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Solomon Islands and Timor-Leste?
- 0.0011, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Timor-Leste?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Solomon Islands and Timor-Leste rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Solomon Islands ranks 164th and Timor-Leste ranks 166th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.