Suriname vs Tunisia: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Suriname
- Tunisia
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 0.2103 against 0.2096 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0007.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Suriname ahead.
Suriname ranks 84th and Tunisia ranks 85th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Suriname averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1544 | 0.1182 | 0.0363 | Suriname |
| 1990s | 0.1387 | 0.1346 | 0.0041 | Suriname |
| 2000s | 0.1398 | 0.1471 | 0.0073 | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0.17 | 0.1877 | 0.0178 | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0.2103 | 0.2096 | 0.0007 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Suriname or Tunisia?
- Suriname, at 0.2103 against 0.2096 in Tunisia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Suriname and Tunisia?
- 0.0007, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Tunisia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Suriname and Tunisia rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Suriname ranks 84th and Tunisia ranks 85th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.