Tajikistan vs East Timor: Financial Institutions Depth Index
Financial Institutions Depth Index over time
- Tajikistan
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 0.0373 against 0.0356 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.0017.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was East Timor ahead.
Tajikistan ranks 168th and East Timor ranks 166th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Tajikistan averaged higher in 3 and East Timor in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tajikistan | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0.0071 | 0 | 0.0071 | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 0.0407 | 0.0233 | 0.0175 | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 0.0415 | 0.026 | 0.0155 | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 0.0356 | 0.0373 | 0.0018 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions depth index, Tajikistan or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 0.0373 against 0.0356 in Tajikistan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions depth index between Tajikistan and East Timor?
- 0.0017, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and East Timor?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Tajikistan and East Timor rank globally for financial institutions depth index?
- Tajikistan ranks 168th and East Timor ranks 166th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.