All Countries vs Qatar: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- All Countries
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 0.7415 against 0.5757 in All Countries, a difference of 0.1658.
That makes Qatar's figure about 1.3 times All Countries's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Qatar ahead.
All Countries ranks 7th and Qatar ranks 4th of 9 groups.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | All Countries | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.4294 | 0.6317 | 0.2023 | Qatar |
| 1990s | 0.5001 | 0.6052 | 0.1051 | Qatar |
| 2000s | 0.5418 | 0.5832 | 0.0414 | Qatar |
| 2010s | 0.5609 | 0.7212 | 0.1603 | Qatar |
| 2020s | 0.5757 | 0.7415 | 0.1658 | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, All Countries or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 0.7415 against 0.5757 in All Countries as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between All Countries and Qatar?
- 0.1658, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for All Countries and Qatar?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do All Countries and Qatar rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- All Countries ranks 7th and Qatar ranks 4th of 9 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.