Argentina vs Chad: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Argentina
- Chad
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 0.4515 against 0.4451 in Chad, a difference of 0.0064.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 164th and Chad ranks 166th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Chad in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.5683 | 0.6136 | 0.0453 | Chad |
| 1990s | 0.4324 | 0.547 | 0.1147 | Chad |
| 2000s | 0.5145 | 0.427 | 0.0875 | Argentina |
| 2010s | 0.5112 | 0.4577 | 0.0535 | Argentina |
| 2020s | 0.4515 | 0.4451 | 0.0064 | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Argentina or Chad?
- Argentina, at 0.4515 against 0.4451 in Chad as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Argentina and Chad?
- 0.0064, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Chad?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Chad rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Argentina ranks 164th and Chad ranks 166th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.