Bangladesh vs Burundi: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Bangladesh
- Burundi
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 0.6716 against 0.6714 in Burundi, a difference of 0.0002.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 35th and Burundi ranks 36th of 183 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Burundi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.6895 | 0.1987 | 0.4908 | Bangladesh |
| 1990s | 0.5747 | 0.428 | 0.1467 | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 0.559 | 0.4606 | 0.0984 | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 0.6469 | 0.464 | 0.1829 | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 0.6716 | 0.6714 | 0.0002 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Bangladesh or Burundi?
- Bangladesh, at 0.6716 against 0.6714 in Burundi as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Bangladesh and Burundi?
- 0.0002, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Burundi?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Bangladesh and Burundi rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Bangladesh ranks 35th and Burundi ranks 36th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.