Barbados vs Mauritania: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Barbados
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 0.5684 against 0.5594 in Barbados, a difference of 0.009.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Mauritania ahead.
Barbados ranks 109th and Mauritania ranks 106th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Mauritania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.4945 | 0.5622 | 0.0677 | Mauritania |
| 1990s | 0.4837 | 0.467 | 0.0167 | Barbados |
| 2000s | 0.6425 | 0.4532 | 0.1893 | Barbados |
| 2010s | 0.6139 | 0.4797 | 0.1342 | Barbados |
| 2020s | 0.5594 | 0.5684 | 0.009 | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Barbados or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 0.5684 against 0.5594 in Barbados as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Barbados and Mauritania?
- 0.009, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Mauritania?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Barbados and Mauritania rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Barbados ranks 109th and Mauritania ranks 106th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.