Bhutan vs Djibouti: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Bhutan
- Djibouti
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 0.604 against 0.6012 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0028.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Djibouti ahead.
Bhutan ranks 82nd and Djibouti ranks 80th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 4 and Djibouti in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.4621 | 0.3543 | 0.1078 | Bhutan |
| 1990s | 0.6084 | 0.5043 | 0.1041 | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 0.6905 | 0.5761 | 0.1144 | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 0.6779 | 0.5818 | 0.0961 | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0.6012 | 0.604 | 0.0028 | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Bhutan or Djibouti?
- Djibouti, at 0.604 against 0.6012 in Bhutan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Bhutan and Djibouti?
- 0.0028, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Djibouti?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Bhutan and Djibouti rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Bhutan ranks 82nd and Djibouti ranks 80th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.