Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Guatemala: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Guatemala
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.6361 against 0.631 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0051.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Guatemala ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 56th and Guatemala ranks 58th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.9032 | 0.9032 | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 0.1849 | 0.5691 | 0.3842 | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 0.4708 | 0.5596 | 0.0888 | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0.5914 | 0.615 | 0.0236 | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 0.6361 | 0.631 | 0.0051 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Guatemala?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.6361 against 0.631 in Guatemala as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guatemala?
- 0.0051, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guatemala?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guatemala rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 56th and Guatemala ranks 58th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.