Cape Verde vs Suriname: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Cape Verde
- Suriname
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 0.6852 against 0.6773 in Suriname, a difference of 0.0079.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 31st and Suriname ranks 34th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.6276 | 0.6654 | 0.0378 | Suriname |
| 1990s | 0.6913 | 0.4583 | 0.233 | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 0.5752 | 0.5149 | 0.0604 | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 0.6127 | 0.6321 | 0.0194 | Suriname |
| 2020s | 0.6852 | 0.6773 | 0.0079 | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Cape Verde or Suriname?
- Cape Verde, at 0.6852 against 0.6773 in Suriname as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Cape Verde and Suriname?
- 0.0079, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Suriname?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Cape Verde and Suriname rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Cape Verde ranks 31st and Suriname ranks 34th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.