Congo vs East Timor: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Congo
- East Timor
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.5108 against 0.5086 in East Timor, a difference of 0.0022.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 141st and East Timor ranks 144th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and East Timor in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.154 | 0 | 0.154 | Congo |
| 1990s | 0.1192 | 0 | 0.1192 | Congo |
| 2000s | 0.1939 | 0.4146 | 0.2207 | East Timor |
| 2010s | 0.5202 | 0.5321 | 0.0118 | East Timor |
| 2020s | 0.5108 | 0.5086 | 0.0023 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Congo or East Timor?
- Congo, at 0.5108 against 0.5086 in East Timor as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Congo and East Timor?
- 0.0022, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and East Timor?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Congo and East Timor rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Congo ranks 141st and East Timor ranks 144th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.