Czechia vs South Korea: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Czechia
- South Korea
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0.7175 against 0.7164 in South Korea, a difference of 0.0011.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was South Korea ahead.
Czechia ranks 16th and South Korea ranks 17th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and South Korea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.5879 | 0.5879 | South Korea |
| 1990s | 0.5751 | 0.62 | 0.0449 | South Korea |
| 2000s | 0.6296 | 0.7048 | 0.0752 | South Korea |
| 2010s | 0.725 | 0.7035 | 0.0215 | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.7175 | 0.7164 | 0.0011 | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Czechia or South Korea?
- Czechia, at 0.7175 against 0.7164 in South Korea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Czechia and South Korea?
- 0.0011, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and South Korea?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Czechia and South Korea rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Czechia ranks 16th and South Korea ranks 17th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.