Czechia vs Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index

Czechia
0.7175
in 2020
Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
0.7204
in 2020
Czechia rank
16th
Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank
15th

Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time

  • Czechia
  • Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
00.20.40.60.81198020002020

How they compare

Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China currently reports 0.7204 against 0.7175 in Czechia, a difference of 0.0029.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ahead.

Czechia ranks 16th and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 15th of 183 countries.

Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China Difference Ahead
1980s 0 0.5422 0.5422 Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
1990s 0.5751 0.807 0.2319 Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
2000s 0.6296 0.7176 0.088 Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
2010s 0.725 0.7259 0.001 Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
2020s 0.7175 0.7204 0.003 Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Czechia or Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China, at 0.7204 against 0.7175 in Czechia as of 2020.
What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Czechia and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
0.0029, with Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
How do Czechia and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
Czechia ranks 16th and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 15th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/financial-institutions-efficiency-index/czechia/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/financial-institutions-efficiency-index/czechia/macao-sar-china/">Czechia vs Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
192 places, 7,872 data points, 1980–2020
Last refreshed

The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.