Dominica vs Guatemala: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Dominica
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 0.631 against 0.6298 in Dominica, a difference of 0.0012.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Guatemala ahead.
Dominica ranks 60th and Guatemala ranks 58th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 3 and Guatemala in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.7022 | 0.9032 | 0.2011 | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 0.5868 | 0.5691 | 0.0177 | Dominica |
| 2000s | 0.6114 | 0.5596 | 0.0518 | Dominica |
| 2010s | 0.6225 | 0.615 | 0.0075 | Dominica |
| 2020s | 0.6298 | 0.631 | 0.0012 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Dominica or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 0.631 against 0.6298 in Dominica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Dominica and Guatemala?
- 0.0012, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Guatemala?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Dominica and Guatemala rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Dominica ranks 60th and Guatemala ranks 58th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.