El Salvador vs United Arab Emirates: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- El Salvador
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 0.4715 against 0.4653 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.0062.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
El Salvador ranks 156th and United Arab Emirates ranks 159th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2737 | 0.5037 | 0.2301 | United Arab Emirates |
| 1990s | 0.4568 | 0.6392 | 0.1824 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2000s | 0.5092 | 0.5877 | 0.0785 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 0.3883 | 0.5205 | 0.1322 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2020s | 0.4715 | 0.4653 | 0.0063 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, El Salvador or United Arab Emirates?
- El Salvador, at 0.4715 against 0.4653 in United Arab Emirates as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between El Salvador and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.0062, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and United Arab Emirates?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do El Salvador and United Arab Emirates rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- El Salvador ranks 156th and United Arab Emirates ranks 159th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.