Estonia vs United States: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Estonia
- United States
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0.6473 against 0.6463 in United States, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was United States ahead.
Estonia ranks 48th and United States ranks 50th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and United States in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.3688 | 0.3688 | United States |
| 1990s | 0.325 | 0.5056 | 0.1806 | United States |
| 2000s | 0.5954 | 0.5042 | 0.0912 | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0.633 | 0.6222 | 0.0108 | Estonia |
| 2020s | 0.6473 | 0.6463 | 0.001 | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Estonia or United States?
- Estonia, at 0.6473 against 0.6463 in United States as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Estonia and United States?
- 0.001, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and United States?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Estonia and United States rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Estonia ranks 48th and United States ranks 50th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.