French Polynesia vs Serbia: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- French Polynesia
- Serbia
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 0.534 against 0.5309 in Serbia, a difference of 0.0031.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Serbia ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 128th and Serbia ranks 129th of 183 countries.
French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 1990s | 0.4219 | 0.2238 | 0.1981 | French Polynesia |
| 2000s | 0.5358 | 0.2565 | 0.2793 | French Polynesia |
| 2010s | 0.5431 | 0.4019 | 0.1412 | French Polynesia |
| 2020s | 0.534 | 0.5309 | 0.0031 | French Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, French Polynesia or Serbia?
- French Polynesia, at 0.534 against 0.5309 in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between French Polynesia and Serbia?
- 0.0031, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Serbia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do French Polynesia and Serbia rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- French Polynesia ranks 128th and Serbia ranks 129th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.