Guatemala vs Mauritius: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Guatemala
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0.6374 against 0.631 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0064.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 58th and Mauritius ranks 55th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.9032 | 0.6798 | 0.2234 | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 0.5691 | 0.6193 | 0.0502 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0.5596 | 0.5497 | 0.0099 | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0.615 | 0.6481 | 0.0331 | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0.631 | 0.6374 | 0.0064 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Guatemala or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 0.6374 against 0.631 in Guatemala as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Guatemala and Mauritius?
- 0.0064, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Mauritius?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Guatemala and Mauritius rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Guatemala ranks 58th and Mauritius ranks 55th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.