Guinea-Bissau vs Uganda: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Uganda
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.5238 against 0.5181 in Uganda, a difference of 0.0057.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Uganda ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 133rd and Uganda ranks 136th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.2289 | 0.2289 | Uganda |
| 1990s | 0.1087 | 0.322 | 0.2133 | Uganda |
| 2000s | 0.2471 | 0.5267 | 0.2796 | Uganda |
| 2010s | 0.4336 | 0.4468 | 0.0132 | Uganda |
| 2020s | 0.5238 | 0.5181 | 0.0058 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Guinea-Bissau or Uganda?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 0.5238 against 0.5181 in Uganda as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Guinea-Bissau and Uganda?
- 0.0057, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Uganda?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Uganda rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 133rd and Uganda ranks 136th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.