Iceland vs Malawi: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Iceland
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.4243 against 0.4027 in Iceland, a difference of 0.0216.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Malawi ahead.
Iceland ranks 173rd and Malawi ranks 171st of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and Malawi in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.299 | 0.3491 | 0.05 | Malawi |
| 1990s | 0.4391 | 0.3809 | 0.0581 | Iceland |
| 2000s | 0.4736 | 0.3944 | 0.0792 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 0.4007 | 0.3569 | 0.0437 | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.4027 | 0.4243 | 0.0216 | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Iceland or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 0.4243 against 0.4027 in Iceland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Iceland and Malawi?
- 0.0216, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malawi?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Iceland and Malawi rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Iceland ranks 173rd and Malawi ranks 171st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.