Indonesia vs Myanmar: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Indonesia
- Myanmar
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 0.6283 against 0.6266 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.0017.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Myanmar ahead.
Indonesia ranks 62nd and Myanmar ranks 63rd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 2 and Myanmar in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.5446 | 0.6853 | 0.1408 | Myanmar |
| 1990s | 0.6069 | 0.7064 | 0.0995 | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 0.6381 | 0.6843 | 0.0462 | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 0.6541 | 0.6529 | 0.0012 | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 0.6283 | 0.6266 | 0.0017 | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Indonesia or Myanmar?
- Indonesia, at 0.6283 against 0.6266 in Myanmar as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Indonesia and Myanmar?
- 0.0017, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Myanmar?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Indonesia and Myanmar rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Indonesia ranks 62nd and Myanmar ranks 63rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.