Japan vs Macau, China: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Japan
- Macau, China
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0.7241 against 0.7204 in Macau, China, a difference of 0.0037.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 12th and Macau, China ranks 15th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 3 and Macau, China in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Macau, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.7758 | 0.5422 | 0.2336 | Japan |
| 1990s | 0.704 | 0.807 | 0.1031 | Macau, China |
| 2000s | 0.7162 | 0.7176 | 0.0014 | Macau, China |
| 2010s | 0.7365 | 0.7259 | 0.0105 | Japan |
| 2020s | 0.7241 | 0.7204 | 0.0036 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Japan or Macau, China?
- Japan, at 0.7241 against 0.7204 in Macau, China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Japan and Macau, China?
- 0.0037, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Macau, China?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Japan and Macau, China rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Japan ranks 12th and Macau, China ranks 15th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.