Kazakhstan vs Kyrgyzstan: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.4634 against 0.4587 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0047.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 160th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 162nd of 183 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0.3444 | 0.2164 | 0.128 | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0.4875 | 0.4133 | 0.0742 | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0.4886 | 0.391 | 0.0976 | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0.4634 | 0.4587 | 0.0046 | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Kazakhstan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.4634 against 0.4587 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.0047, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Kazakhstan ranks 160th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 162nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.