South Korea vs Macao: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- South Korea
- Macao
How they compare
Macao currently reports 0.7204 against 0.7164 in South Korea, a difference of 0.004.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was South Korea ahead.
South Korea ranks 17th and Macao ranks 15th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 1 and Macao in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.5879 | 0.5422 | 0.0457 | South Korea |
| 1990s | 0.62 | 0.807 | 0.187 | Macao |
| 2000s | 0.7048 | 0.7176 | 0.0128 | Macao |
| 2010s | 0.7035 | 0.7259 | 0.0225 | Macao |
| 2020s | 0.7164 | 0.7204 | 0.0041 | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, South Korea or Macao?
- Macao, at 0.7204 against 0.7164 in South Korea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between South Korea and Macao?
- 0.004, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Macao?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do South Korea and Macao rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- South Korea ranks 17th and Macao ranks 15th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.