Kuwait vs Lebanon: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Kuwait
- Lebanon
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 0.7122 against 0.7078 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.0044.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Lebanon ahead.
Kuwait ranks 18th and Lebanon ranks 19th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 3 and Lebanon in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.7064 | 0.7826 | 0.0762 | Lebanon |
| 1990s | 0.7237 | 0.6632 | 0.0605 | Kuwait |
| 2000s | 0.7393 | 0.7012 | 0.0381 | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 0.7026 | 0.7119 | 0.0093 | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 0.7122 | 0.7078 | 0.0045 | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Kuwait or Lebanon?
- Kuwait, at 0.7122 against 0.7078 in Lebanon as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Kuwait and Lebanon?
- 0.0044, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Lebanon?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Kuwait and Lebanon rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Kuwait ranks 18th and Lebanon ranks 19th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.