Laos vs Madagascar: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Laos
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 0.5784 against 0.5768 in Laos, a difference of 0.0016.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Madagascar ahead.
Laos ranks 100th and Madagascar ranks 98th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Laos averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0658 | 0.3534 | 0.2875 | Madagascar |
| 1990s | 0.5979 | 0.4421 | 0.1558 | Laos |
| 2000s | 0.5513 | 0.591 | 0.0397 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 0.4651 | 0.5343 | 0.0692 | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 0.5768 | 0.5784 | 0.0016 | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Laos or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 0.5784 against 0.5768 in Laos as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Laos and Madagascar?
- 0.0016, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Madagascar?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Laos and Madagascar rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Laos ranks 100th and Madagascar ranks 98th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.