Lebanon vs Sweden: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Lebanon
- Sweden
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 0.7078 against 0.7071 in Sweden, a difference of 0.0007.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 19th and Sweden ranks 20th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.7826 | 0.7076 | 0.075 | Lebanon |
| 1990s | 0.6632 | 0.6425 | 0.0208 | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 0.7012 | 0.7217 | 0.0205 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0.7119 | 0.7154 | 0.0035 | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.7078 | 0.7071 | 0.0007 | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Lebanon or Sweden?
- Lebanon, at 0.7078 against 0.7071 in Sweden as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Lebanon and Sweden?
- 0.0007, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Sweden?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Lebanon and Sweden rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Lebanon ranks 19th and Sweden ranks 20th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.