Liberia vs Saudi Arabia: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Liberia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.3798 against 0.3679 in Liberia, a difference of 0.0119.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Liberia ranks 177th and Saudi Arabia ranks 175th of 183 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2563 | 0.4762 | 0.2199 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1990s | 0.242 | 0.6284 | 0.3864 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 0.24 | 0.4301 | 0.1901 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 0.2747 | 0.3543 | 0.0796 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 0.3679 | 0.3798 | 0.0119 | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Liberia or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 0.3798 against 0.3679 in Liberia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Liberia and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.0119, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Saudi Arabia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Liberia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Liberia ranks 177th and Saudi Arabia ranks 175th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.