Libya vs Slovak Republic: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Libya
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Slovak Republic currently reports 0.583 against 0.581 in Libya, a difference of 0.002.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 96th and Slovak Republic ranks 93rd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 4 and Slovak Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.6867 | 0 | 0.6867 | Libya |
| 1990s | 0.6623 | 0.4614 | 0.2009 | Libya |
| 2000s | 0.6372 | 0.5042 | 0.133 | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.6412 | 0.5741 | 0.0671 | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.581 | 0.583 | 0.002 | Slovak Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Libya or Slovak Republic?
- Slovak Republic, at 0.583 against 0.581 in Libya as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Libya and Slovak Republic?
- 0.002, with Slovak Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Slovak Republic?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Libya and Slovak Republic rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Libya ranks 96th and Slovak Republic ranks 93rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.