Lithuania vs Uzbekistan: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Lithuania
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 0.6006 against 0.5955 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0051.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Lithuania ranks 86th and Uzbekistan ranks 84th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 1990s | 0.1799 | 0.5178 | 0.3379 | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0.5099 | 0.4871 | 0.0228 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.5827 | 0.5636 | 0.0191 | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.5955 | 0.6006 | 0.0051 | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Lithuania or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 0.6006 against 0.5955 in Lithuania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Lithuania and Uzbekistan?
- 0.0051, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Uzbekistan?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Lithuania and Uzbekistan rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Lithuania ranks 86th and Uzbekistan ranks 84th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.