Nicaragua vs East Timor: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Nicaragua
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 0.5086 against 0.5023 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0063.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 146th and East Timor ranks 144th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 3 and East Timor in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.6767 | 0 | 0.6767 | Nicaragua |
| 1990s | 0.5656 | 0 | 0.5656 | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 0.5325 | 0.4146 | 0.1178 | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 0.5219 | 0.5321 | 0.0102 | East Timor |
| 2020s | 0.5023 | 0.5086 | 0.0063 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Nicaragua or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 0.5086 against 0.5023 in Nicaragua as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Nicaragua and East Timor?
- 0.0063, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and East Timor?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Nicaragua and East Timor rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Nicaragua ranks 146th and East Timor ranks 144th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.