South Africa vs Uruguay: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- South Africa
- Uruguay
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.666 against 0.6589 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0071.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Uruguay ahead.
South Africa ranks 41st and Uruguay ranks 43rd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 4 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.5644 | 0.742 | 0.1776 | Uruguay |
| 1990s | 0.5791 | 0.3432 | 0.2358 | South Africa |
| 2000s | 0.6536 | 0.3744 | 0.2792 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 0.6656 | 0.5512 | 0.1144 | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0.666 | 0.6589 | 0.0072 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, South Africa or Uruguay?
- South Africa, at 0.666 against 0.6589 in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between South Africa and Uruguay?
- 0.0071, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Uruguay?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do South Africa and Uruguay rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- South Africa ranks 41st and Uruguay ranks 43rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.