Sri Lanka vs Thailand: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Sri Lanka
- Thailand
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0.6921 against 0.6808 in Thailand, a difference of 0.0113.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Thailand ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 29th and Thailand ranks 32nd of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.6587 | 0.7467 | 0.088 | Thailand |
| 1990s | 0.5776 | 0.6783 | 0.1007 | Thailand |
| 2000s | 0.5966 | 0.6819 | 0.0854 | Thailand |
| 2010s | 0.6942 | 0.6956 | 0.0014 | Thailand |
| 2020s | 0.6921 | 0.6808 | 0.0113 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Sri Lanka or Thailand?
- Sri Lanka, at 0.6921 against 0.6808 in Thailand as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Sri Lanka and Thailand?
- 0.0113, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Thailand?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Sri Lanka and Thailand rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Sri Lanka ranks 29th and Thailand ranks 32nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.