Saint Lucia vs Syria: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Saint Lucia
- Syria
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 0.6304 against 0.6292 in Syria, a difference of 0.0012.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Saint Lucia ranks 59th and Syria ranks 61st of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Saint Lucia averaged higher in 4 and Syria in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.6516 | 0.5943 | 0.0573 | Saint Lucia |
| 1990s | 0.685 | 0.6058 | 0.0793 | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 0.6536 | 0.5796 | 0.074 | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 0.5442 | 0.555 | 0.0107 | Syria |
| 2020s | 0.6304 | 0.6292 | 0.0012 | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Saint Lucia or Syria?
- Saint Lucia, at 0.6304 against 0.6292 in Syria as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Saint Lucia and Syria?
- 0.0012, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Syria?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Saint Lucia and Syria rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Saint Lucia ranks 59th and Syria ranks 61st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.