Africa vs Luxembourg: Financial Institutions Index
Financial Institutions Index over time
- Africa
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.8879 against 0.2479 in Africa, a difference of 0.64.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 3.6 times Africa's.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Africa ranks 9th and Luxembourg ranks 6th of 9 groups.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1514 | 0.7499 | 0.5985 | Luxembourg |
| 1990s | 0.1744 | 0.8219 | 0.6475 | Luxembourg |
| 2000s | 0.1924 | 0.8233 | 0.6309 | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0.2349 | 0.8409 | 0.606 | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0.2479 | 0.8879 | 0.64 | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions index, Africa or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 0.8879 against 0.2479 in Africa as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions index between Africa and Luxembourg?
- 0.64, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa and Luxembourg?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Africa and Luxembourg rank globally for financial institutions index?
- Africa ranks 9th and Luxembourg ranks 6th of 9 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.